Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Final Analysis



Overall, I have learned a different way to look at the Bad Girls Club. The show is not just about crazy girls doing crazy things for attention; the show is more about relatable ways to show people how you can change, what you need to do to be a better person and how to overcome the problems in your life. By finding the stereotypes of these woman and people seeing how acting this way can be a negative imagine, can really teach people the benefits to acting better.
            It is also relative to me, at this point, why this show is so popular and the branding that Oxygen has done to keep this show in good ratings. I’ve seen a side to social media that shows the direct way that pop culture is leaning for the future. I believe that this show has good positions and bad positions. Not a lot of people can look at the show and see that it is about growth in women and turning into a powerful, intelligent, and motivated woman because the woman that are chosen don’t always change – actually, they rarely change.
            I think that it was interesting for me to really look at this show and find the formulas to its success or its reason. The show has been a huge part of my excitement for so long that I never really thought about the reason the show was created and what they were really aiming for. I believe that this show is a great example of the direction that pop culture and the reality television world is trying to take. It seems as each show comes out, they are trying to force people together to learn that outside of the cities you are from, there are more people that handle situations in different ways and can really teach you how to grow and become better people.
            From this point forward, I will still love this show. I will just look at the cast in a different way. I would look at them and figure out why they were chosen and how they benefit the point of the show and the image that this show wants to make.

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Journal Analysis



Journal Analysis
                        The journal article I have chosen to do my analysis over is “Supersizing America: Fatness and Post-9/11 Cultural Anxieties.” This journal article is all about the effects and meanings of over-consumption and how they can relate these reasons to the 9/11 terrorist attack. The majority of the journal is in relation to the 2004 film Supersize Me, by Morgan Spurlock, and it depicts his take on America and their need/desires for fast food, like McDonald’s. The basis of the journal is around how over-consumption leads to obesity and how that makes men more feminine, less productive and more vulnerable. The journal also states that after 9/11 the world needed to be dependent on something and pretty much needed to place blame somewhere so the overindulgence of food became the answer.
            This journal goes into detail about how bulimia and obesity are both risks when it comes to fast food and how the nation will die off in the end if obesity isn’t controlled. They place most of the blame for obesity on the companies themselves, and another portion of the blame is on the parents of obese children.
            With the large amount of data from the Supersize Me movie and the TV show created by Spurlock, 30 Days, the journal focuses a lot on the unintelligence of America and the importance of educating them on eating better. The journal ridicules those that are obese by giving reasons why these citizens are “lazy” or “unproductive.” They push for reasons on the company selling the food but happen to mention that people should change themselves rather than the company changing. There is a note where they believe that if they educate the public on organic food – which they note as incredibly more expense than fast food, which causes the purchasing of these goods to be small – then they can quit buying fast food, which would make these companies go under, or make them change their mission and turn to healthier options. Although the article is about relating fatness to the 9/11 attack, the article really is just geared towards trying to change people and their obesity.
            It is hard to distinguish if I agree or disagree with this article because of all of the different points that they bring out. I do agree that obesity is an issue in America, and I do agree that the changes need to come from the community and not the companies. Companies are created for the purpose of making money, if a company is making money off of something, they will not shut down. If we would attack companies for being the death of America, why not attack tobacco companies? I do not agree with associating laziness and 9/11 with obesity. I believe that people handle stress, sadness, happiness, and grief in many different ways; I also believe that overindulgence is one way that people cope with these feelings. My disagreement comes into place when they base the majority of obesity on these coping methods.
            The author of this journal, Courtney Bailey, and the references that were used, Morgan Spurlock to be specific, try to eliminate the idea of outside causes for obesity and putting it mainly on the fast food industry. They seem to forget that some health issues can cause these problems without ever eating a single burger in their life, or the cost relating to eating food is too much for someone to spend 3 or 4 times the amount of money on something that is “organic.” They forget about allergies and about cultures and other possible reasons for obesity. The way the movie and this article were written was so judgmental and insinuative that it can lead people to either “eat their feelings” and be more obese or become anorexic or bulimic.
            I do believe that the world knows that obesity is a problem, but to target the group with assumptions, stereotypes and name-calling is not the way to address the issue. Root causes should be found and motivation should be acquired. Trying to compare 9/11 and obesity and stating that they relate to one another in any way is like trying to say that I poop on a daily basis because I decided not to work anymore. Yes, I may have decided not to work anymore and yes I may poop on a daily basis, but the likelihood that one is happening because of the other is unrealistic. Yes, 9/11 did happen and yes, America has the highest rate of obesity, but to try and claim that the two correlate with each other is invalid. Maybe feelings relating to both, but the middleman is missing.
            I will admit that this side of the story – aside from relating it to 9/11 – is a side that can help some individuals with their obesity problems. It does give some ideas on ways to try and fix the problems and it also shows what can happen to the body, mind, and life cycle if the “problem” of obesity continues; this can help motivate some individuals. I do believe that it is an important topic to discuss as well. I just do not believe that it took the right route in trying to “fix” the problem. Degrading people and poking at their problems usually doesn’t lead them down a path of recovery or change, it leads to depression or retaliation, most of the time. The idea of the movie and journal were sound, I just view it as the wrong approach to the problem.



References
Bailey, C. Supersizing America: Fatness and Post-9/11 Cultural Anxieties. The Journal of Popular Culture, 43, 441-462.

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Bad Girls Club Formula



The point in watching reality TV is to see and feel like you are a part of something that is like a fantasy to you. The idea of drama is something that pulls many people in. The Bad Girls Club uses this type of fantasy to pull people into watching their show and hooking them to continue watching. The thrill of wondering who is going to do what crazy things next week or what twist will happen will keep the suspense alive. This is the formula that this show goes after; insane women that will do anything for fame, money and ratings.
Bad-girls-logo-season3.jpgThe Bad Girls Club continually chooses their cast by finding the craziest, wildest, most vulgar, most insane girls they can find. These girls feed into this formula and make it so popular. The Bad Girls Club is not the only show that does this. There is the Real World, which pulls the man side in as well. There are the Real World Challenges, which are dipped in crazy with a side of nuts – literally. This formula is the basis for reality TV these days. Viewers just can’t get enough of the drama.
The alliances, the backstabbing, the loyalty, the friendship, the craziness; this will forever be what reality TV is all about and what the Bad Girls Club will also portray. Oxygen and MTV made great choices in the shows that they have picked to use this type of formula and it has boosted their rating immensely. With the reunion special for Bad Girls Club All-star Battle – a spin-off of the Bad Girls Club – Oxygen saw the highest ratings in their 13-year career, pulling in 1.73 million viewers. (Kissell, 2013) This shows the power of the formula they use and the benefit that it really has.
I agree with it. I believe that there are many things that this world wants to see and this just so happens to be one of them. Like in a previous paper I wrote, people love to see what they never want to be involved in. It is a great tactic by Oxygen – and MTV – and will continue to grow in this business.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Heroes and Celebrities of BGC



When it comes to the girls of the Bad Girls Club, I have to say that the “hero” aspect isn’t noticeable. In order to consider any of the girls a “hero,” you must look at a meaning that isn’t as well known. If you look at a hero as someone who defends others without question, or stands up against bullying even when everyone else bows down to it, or the one person that stays true to themselves even when people try to bring them down, then this show has that type of hero.
            As a couple of examples I would like to point out specific girls from specific seasons that showed heroic characteristics:
1.      Nicole “Nikki” Galladay – Nikki is from season 6 and she came in the house with the nickname “The Prankster.” She was a housemate that marched to the beat of her own drum. She stayed true to herself and her ways even when all the other girls in the house tried to run her out. She was a hero to viewers by showing them that standing your ground and being true to yourself is the best way to handle any situation you are put in.(BGC Season 6)

2.      Judi Jai – Judi is from season 7 and she laid down the truth that sometimes all a hero has to do is “take one for the team. Judi was the most picked on cast member of the season because she made herself very vulnerable to everyone. She shows her hero status towards the middle of the season because she “takes one for the team.” As the girls in her group, Stasi and Tiara, begin disliking some of the other girls, they use Judi, and her drunk antics, to push the other girls to the limit. Judi shows defense and heart when she stands up to these other girls, ultimately sending them home. (BGC Season 7)
3.      Paula Hellens – Paula is from season 10 and she is the prime example of a great hero. Paula stayed out of the drama unless it was something she was passionate about. She will defend her close friends and she will continue to be loyal to everyone who gives her the same in return. She is a great example of a hero because she is a idol to the bad girls by showing them how a true bad girl should act, as one of her famous lines “fighting doesn’t make you a bad girl.” This speaks words. She shows that you can be a bad girl but be respectful. (BGC Season 10)
Many girls come on this show in hopes of becoming a celebrity and getting their name out there and maybe even receiving opportunities they didn’t have before. This shows the power of being a celebrity and the things people will do to achieve it. There are two types of these girls on the show, there are the girls who come in acting insane to get this fame, and then there are the girls who change and evolve throughout the show and gain the status after. There are two main examples of the two:
1.      Natalie Nunn – Natalie is the prime example of someone who thinks they are already a celebrity. She is the queen of name dropping and insinuating that she is better or more powerful than all of the other girls. She graced us on season 4 of the Bad Girls Club and she has made multiple appearances in other seasons and has kept her fame up. (BGC Season 4)

2.      Tanisha Thomas – Tanisha was in season 2 of the Bad Girls Club and she dominated the role of the head of the house. She had followers, she had phrases (“Pop off”), she showed the real reason she was considered a “bad girls.” What gave her the great celebrity status happened after her season. She changed, she became more respectful, she learned from the antics she had on her season and she showed people how a real bad girls acts. She now hosts the reunion shows, and also Love Games: Bad Girls Need Love Too. She has turned her life around to really take this celebrity role on. (BGC Season 2)



 I believe the biggest difference between the two of these is that the hero is found by actions but the celebrity status is sought after. Both can be good though. They give people someone to look up to that might really deserve it.